This policy was reviewed as part of the standard 6-year review process. Policy was revised to align more closely with UNT System model policy. Multiple editorial and formatting updates were also completed.
This policy was reviewed as part of the standard 6-year review process. Revisions to this policy include the addition of accounting obligations to the definition of a sponsored project, the addition of students to the application of this policy, and including clarifying language throughout most sections of the policy. Multiple editorial and formatting updates were also completed.
This policy was amended out-of-cycle of the standard 6-year review. Clarifying language was added across most definitions and responsibilities to align more closely with UNT System model policy. Multiple editorial and formatting updates were also completed.
This policy was reviewed as part of the standard 6-year review process. Revisions include changes to the policy statement and clarifying language used in the academic matters section. Multiple editorial and formatting changes were also made.
This policy was reviewed as part of the standard 6-year review process. Revisions to this policy include adding a definition for faculty workload, scholarship, service, teaching, workload equity, and workload guidelines. Clarifying language related to timing for requests in exceptional circumstances was also added. The timeline for faculty complaints has been updated to 10 business days from 14 calendar days. Multiple editorial and formatting revisions were also completed.
This policy was reviewed as part of the standard 6-year review cycle. Revisions include adding a definition for faculty, the creation of a new classification of development leave, and the separation of the leave request process into its own separate document titled "Development Leave Request Procedure". Minor editorial changes were also made.
This policy was revised to reflect GPA requirement changes in relation to financial aid suspension, warning, and probation. References to the loss of eligibility appeal process now directs readers to the Satisfactory Academic Progress website. Editorial and formatting updates were made during this process.
This policy was updated in response to the Department of Defense (DoD)/Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)’s prohibition on providing funding to or making an award of a fundamental research project proposal in which a covered individual is participating in a malign foreign talent recruitment program or to a proposing institution that does not have a policy addressing malign foreign talent programs pursuant to Section 10632 of the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022.
This policy was reviewed as part of the standard 6-year review process. Clarifying language was added to the Guidelines for Negative Decisions, Stop-The-Clock Extension, and Eligibility/Criteria for Promotion of Assistant Librarian sections. Various formatting and minor editorial changes were also made throughout the policy.
